Fernand Kartheiser was a member of the Chamber of Deputies for ADR, from 23 November 2023 until 25 June 2024.
\nSpoke on bills: PL8161, PL8162, PL8287, PL8304, PL8316, PL8355, PL8383.
\n16 January 2024 — stating his party's concern about the standard of Luxembourg security clearances
\n\n\nEt ass eis Suerg, datt déi Habilitations de sécurité net deem Niveau entspriechen, dee se missten hunn.
\n
It is our concern that the security clearances do not match the level they ought to have.
\n\n20 March 2024 — stating that the court's deadline has passed
\n\n\nMir hunn d’Delaie gekuckt beim Internationale Geriichtshaff. Deen ass den 22. Januar ofgelaf.
\n
We looked at the deadlines at the International Court of Justice. It expired on 22 January.
\n\n16 May 2024 — arguing that Europeans share responsibility for destabilising the Sahel region
\n\n\nDat ass, datt mir als Europäer, wa mer iwwert de Sahel schwätzen, och eng Matresponsabilitéit fir d’Destabiliséierung vun där Regioun matdroen.
\n
It is that we as Europeans, when we talk about the Sahel, also bear a share of responsibility for the destabilisation of that region.
\n\n24 April 2024 — opposing the creation of the Belgian-Luxembourg battalion
\n\n\nAwer woumadder mir net d’accord sinn – an dat wëll ech och ganz kloer soen –, dat ass d’Kreatioun vun engem belsch-Lëtzebuerger Batailloun.
\n
But what we do not agree with, and I want to say this quite clearly, is the creation of a Belgian-Luxembourg battalion.
\n\n24 April 2024 — arguing that the money spent on arms deliveries will not save Ukraine
\n\n\nMir mussen einfach wëssen: Déi Suen, déi dohi ginn, retten d’Ukrain net, sécher net!
\n
We simply have to know: the money that goes there will not save Ukraine, certainly not!
\n\n24 April 2024 — restating the ADR position on people whose asylum claim has failed
\n\n\nWat mir awer och soen, ass, datt Leit, déi kee Schutz méi brauchen, Leit, déi keen Asyl zegutt hunn, mussen d’Land verloossen.
\n
But what we also say is that people who no longer need protection, people who are not entitled to asylum, have to leave the country.
\n\n15 May 2024 — announcing his party's rejection of the motion and giving the reason
\n\n\nMir als ADR stëmmen dat hei net mat, well et ass net am Interessi vum Land, et ass net am Interessi vun deene sozial Schwaachen.
\n
We as the ADR are not voting for this, because it is not in the interest of the country, it is not in the interest of the socially weak.
\n\n16 January 2024 — calling on the government to give large-scale humanitarian aid in Gaza
\n\n\nD’ADR rifft d’Regierung dozou op, der palästinensescher ziviller Populatioun an der Gazasträif massiv a generéis humanitär Hëllef ze leeschten.
\n
The ADR calls on the government to give massive and generous humanitarian aid to the Palestinian civilian population in the Gaza Strip.
\n\n30 January 2024 — contrasting Luxembourg's continued payments with partners that stopped theirs
\n\n\nD’Lëtzebuerger Regierung bezilt awer virun, wärend vill anerer vun eise Partner an Alliéierten dat net méi maachen.
\n
The Luxembourg government keeps on paying, while many of our partners and allies no longer do.
\n\n14 May 2024 — stating opposition to recognising a Palestinian state at this moment
\n\n\nEng eventuell Unerkennung vum Staat Palästina zu dësem Abléck ass net opportun.
\n
A possible recognition of the State of Palestine at this moment is not opportune.
\n\n27 February 2024 — asking the Prime Minister to rule out sending Luxembourg soldiers to Ukraine
\n\n\nKënnt Dir hei kloer soen, datt mir kee Lëtzebuerger Militär an der Ukrain asetzen, wéinstens net, soulaang eng Krichssituatioun do besteet?
\n
Can you say clearly here that we will deploy no Luxembourg military in Ukraine, at least as long as a war situation exists there?
\n\n19 March 2024 — stating his party's position that it recognises the election result
\n\n\nMir musse soen, fir eis: Mir erkennen d’Resultat vun de Walen un.
\n
We have to say, for our part: we recognise the result of the elections.
\n\nOne recorded quote each, so these are single entries rather than timelines.
\n\n\nAn hei steet och am Rapport, datt d’Europäesch Kommissioun eis gefrot huet, eng méi literal Ëmsetzung ze maache vun deem Text.
\n
And it also says in the report that the European Commission asked us to make a more literal transposition of that text.
\n\n\nMir hätte gär, datt dat um Niveau EU oder OECD gereegelt gëtt – do gehéiert et hin –, well mir wëlle keng konkurrenziell Nodeeler.
\n
We would like this to be regulated at EU or OECD level, that is where it belongs, because we do not want competitive disadvantages.
"}