Bill 7650 (\"Protection intérêts consommateurs\"). The Chamber debated and voted it on 30 October 2025.
\nSittings: Sitting of 30 October 2025, Sitting of 30 October 2025
\nThe Chamber held the general discussion on bill 7650, which transposes EU directive 2020/1828 and creates a collective redress action for consumers, then adopted the bill unanimously with 60 votes and dispensed with the second constitutional vote, and adopted by show of hands a motion by Stéphanie Weydert asking for an evaluation of the law after five years.
\nStéphanie Weydert (CSV), presenting the bill as an instrument that lets a single consumer take a large company to court:
\n\n\nMam Gesetz, wat mir haut stëmmen, stäerke mir de Konsumenteschutz. Mir schafen en Instrument, dat dem klengen David d’Méiglechkeet gëtt, sech am Fall vun engem Schued géint de grousse Goliath viru Geriicht duerchzesetzen.
\n
With the law we are voting today, we strengthen consumer protection. We are creating an instrument that gives little David the possibility to prevail in court against big Goliath in the event of damage.
\nSitting of 30 October 2025, Stéphanie Weydert, CSV
\nPaulette Lenert (LSAP), saying the text does not go far enough and calling for a bolder model of collective action:
\n\n\nHaut am Beräich vun der Sammelklo hätt ech mir deemno vläicht och e bësselche méi e couragéierte Gesetzestext gewënscht, e Modell vu Sammelklo, deen eng kloer Haltung zum Ausdrock bréngt, eng Haltung fir Gerechtegkeet an e konsequente Kräfteausgläich um Marché.
\n
On collective action today, I would have wished for a somewhat bolder legal text, a model of collective action that expresses a clear stance, a stance for justice and for a consistent balance of forces on the market.
\nSitting of 30 October 2025, Paulette Lenert, LSAP
\nAlexandra Schoos (ADR), criticising the bill for a lack of clarity and practical workability:
\n\n\nDen aktuellen Text iwwerzeegt eis awer eeben net am Hibléck op d’Kloerheet an d’Effizienz bezéiungsweis d’Praxistauglechkeet.
\n
The present text does not convince us as regards clarity and efficiency, or its usability in practice.
\nSitting of 30 October 2025, Alexandra Schoos, ADR
\n30 October 2025 — Premier vote constitutionnel.
\n| Party | For | Against | Abstain |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSV | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| DP | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| LSAP | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| ADR | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| déi gréng | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Piraten | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| déi Lénk | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 0 | 0 |
No deputy voted against the majority of their party in this vote.
"}