Bill 8224 (\"Extensions de la ligne de tramway\"). The Chamber debated and voted it on 1 February 2024.
\nSittings: Sitting of 1 February 2024
\nThe Chamber debated and voted bill 8224, the fourth financing law for the tram, covering two extensions in Luxembourg City, and then debated a déi gréng motion, signed also by LSAP and déi Lénk, asking the government to treat the extension to the CHL as a priority; the motion was sent to committee.
\nCorinne Cahen (DP), reporting the cost of the two extensions and how it is split between state and city:
\n\n\nD’Gesamtkäschte vun dësen zwou Extensioune belafe sech op 135 Milliounen Euro. Dovunner iwwerhëlt de Staat der 90 Milliounen an d’Stad Lëtzebuerg iwwerhëlt de Rescht.
\n
The total cost of these two extensions comes to 135 million euros. Of that the state takes 90 million and the City of Luxembourg takes the rest.
\nSitting of 1 February 2024, Corinne Cahen, DP
\nMeris Sehovic (déi gréng), calling on the minister to move the financing law for the CHL extension forward as a priority:
\n\n\nEch riichten hei e waarmen Appell un d’Ministesch an un déi ganz Regierung, fir dat entspriechend Finanzéierungsgesetz mat grousser Prioritéit op den Instanzewee ze bréngen.
\n
I address a warm appeal here to the minister and to the whole government to put the corresponding financing law through the procedure as a high priority.
\nSitting of 1 February 2024, Meris Sehovic, déi gréng
\nJeff Engelen (ADR), backing further tram expansion:
\n\n\nEt ass wichteg, datt mer den Tram ausbauen, well ech mengen, wa mer stoe bleiwen, wou en elo steet, da gi mer zréck.
\n
It is important that we expand the tram, because I think if we stop where it now stands, we go backwards.
\nSitting of 1 February 2024, Jeff Engelen, ADR
\n1 February 2024 — Premier vote constitutionnel.
\n| Party | For | Against | Abstain |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSV | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| DP | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| LSAP | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| ADR | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| déi gréng | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Piraten | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| déi Lénk | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 0 | 0 |
No deputy voted against the majority of their party in this vote.
"}