Bill 8259 (\"Sécurité sociale\"). The Chamber debated and voted it on 16 May 2024.
\nSittings: Sitting of 16 May 2024
\nthe Chamber debated and adopted projet de loi 8259, which moves the procedure before the social security courts from a grand-ducal regulation into law after the Constitutional Court found a breach of the réserve de la loi, and waived the second constitutional vote
\nMars Di Bartolomeo (LSAP), stating that the bill restores legal certainty for procedures before the social security courts:
\n\n\nDe Projet ass vun dem Virgänger vun der jëtzeger Sozialministerin, dem Claude Haagen, deponéiert ginn an e wäert erëm fir déi noutwenneg Rechtssécherheet, wat d’Prozedure bei de Geriichtbarkeete vun der Sécurité sociale ugeet, suergen.
\n
The bill was tabled by the predecessor of the current social affairs minister, Claude Haagen, and it will restore the necessary legal certainty for procedures before the social security courts.
\nSitting of 16 May 2024, Mars Di Bartolomeo, LSAP
\nSven Clement (Piraten), regretting that representation by a trade union rather than a lawyer is being dropped:
\n\n\nMir Piraten hätten eis hei dofir gewënscht, datt u sech déi Méiglechkeet, fir sech och zum Beispill vu senger Gewerkschaft, ouni datt dat muss en Affekot sinn, vertrieden ze loossen, bäibehale gi wär.
\n
We Pirates would have liked the option of being represented by your trade union, for example, without it having to be a lawyer, to have been kept.
\nSitting of 16 May 2024, Sven Clement, Piraten
\nCarole Hartmann (DP), correcting the claim that a lawyer becomes compulsory at first instance:
\n\n\nEt ass net esou, dass een an éischter Instanz, wann ee virun de Conseil arbitral geet, sech muss vun engem Affekot vertriede loossen.
\n
It is not the case that at first instance, when you go before the Conseil arbitral, you have to be represented by a lawyer.
\nSitting of 16 May 2024, Carole Hartmann, DP
\n16 May 2024 — Premier vote constitutionnel.
\n| Party | For | Against | Abstain |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSV | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| DP | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| LSAP | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| ADR | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| déi gréng | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Piraten | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| déi Lénk | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 0 | 0 |
No deputy voted against the majority of their party in this vote.
"}