Bill 8387 (\"Réglementation cryptoactifs\"). The Chamber debated and voted it on 22 January 2025.
\nSittings: Sitting of 22 January 2025, Sitting of 22 January 2025
\nBill 8387, which implements the EU MiCA, TFR2, ELTIF and green bond regulations in Luxembourg financial law, was before the Chamber for a vote.
\nDiane Adehm (CSV), reporting on what the MiCA regulation means for the financial centre:
\n\n\nDëst EU-Reglement wäert weider Opportunitéite schafen an et der Finanzplaz erméiglechen, sech weider ze diversifizéieren.
\n
This EU regulation will create further opportunities and let the financial centre diversify further.
\nSitting of 22 January 2025, Diane Adehm, CSV
\nAndré Bauler (DP), stating his party's position on regulating crypto-assets:
\n\n\nDofir brauche mer eng staark, kloer, reguléiert an zukunftsorientéiert Finanzplaz, mat där mir als Land international interessant an eeben och konkurrenzfäeg bleiwen.
\n
That is why we need a strong, clear, regulated and forward-looking financial centre, one that keeps us internationally attractive and competitive as a country.
\nSitting of 22 January 2025, André Bauler, DP
\nFranz Fayot (LSAP), stating his party's scepticism about crypto-assets as a growth niche, while still voting for the bill:
\n\n\nHär President, mir sinn als LSAP bei aller Léift zur Innovatioun – a vläicht anescht wéi meng Virriedner – net iwwerzeegt, dass d’Kryptoavoiren déi nächst grouss Nisch, déi nächst grouss Saach fir d’Lëtzebuerger Finanzplaz solle ginn.
\n
Mr President, as the LSAP, for all our love of innovation, and perhaps unlike the previous speakers, we are not convinced that crypto-assets should become the next big niche, the next big thing for the Luxembourg financial centre.
\nSitting of 22 January 2025, Franz Fayot, LSAP
\n22 January 2025 — Premier vote constitutionnel.
\n| Party | For | Against | Abstain |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSV | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| DP | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| LSAP | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| ADR | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| déi gréng | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Piraten | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| déi Lénk | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 58 | 0 | 2 |
No deputy voted against the majority of their party in this vote.
"}