Bill 8592 (\"Prestataires crypto-actifs\"). The Chamber debated and voted it on 19 March 2026.
\nSittings: Sitting of 19 March 2026
\nThe Chamber debated and adopted bill 8592, which transposes the DAC 8 directive on automatic exchange of tax information reported by crypto-asset service providers.
\nDiane Adehm (CSV), presenting the bill as rapporteur:
\n\n\nDe Gesetzesprojet 8592 setzt eng weider wichteg Direktiv am Steierberäich ëm, déi sougenannten DAC-8-Direktiv.
\n
Bill 8592 transposes another important directive in the tax field, the so-called DAC 8 directive.
\nSitting of 19 March 2026, Diane Adehm, CSV
\nAndré Bauler (DP), explaining why the bill is needed against tax evasion through crypto-assets:
\n\n\nHei geet et also och virun allem ëm steierlech Transparenz. Laang Zäit konnten nämlech verschidden Transaktioune ronderëm Kryptowäerter de Steierverwaltungen einfach entwutschen, well se vun enger gewëssener Anonymitéit profitéiert hunn.
\n
So this is above all about tax transparency. For a long time various transactions around crypto-assets could simply escape the tax administrations, because they benefited from a certain anonymity.
\nSitting of 19 March 2026, André Bauler, DP
\nFranz Fayot (LSAP), criticising the different reporting duties for accountants and lawyers while backing the bill:
\n\n\nDat Eenzegt, wou mir e bësse manner iwwerzeegt sinn, wéi d’Rapportrice dat duergestallt huet, dat ass d’Diskrepanz zwëschent deene verschiddenen Intermediairen, insbesondere den Expert-comptablen an den Affekoten.
\n
The only point where we are a little less convinced, as the rapporteur presented it, is the discrepancy between the different intermediaries, in particular the accountants and the lawyers.
\nSitting of 19 March 2026, Franz Fayot, LSAP
\n19 March 2026 — Premier vote constitutionnel.
\n| Party | For | Against | Abstain |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSV | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| DP | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| LSAP | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| ADR | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| déi gréng | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Piraten | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| déi Lénk | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 0 | 0 |
No deputy voted against the majority of their party in this vote.
"}