Bill 8632. The Chamber debated and voted it on 29 April 2026.
\nSittings: Sitting of 29 April 2026, Sitting of 29 April 2026
\nTwo bus financing bills were debated and voted: projet de loi 8632 on school bus transport, adopted by 51 votes to 4 with 5 abstentions, and projet de loi 8637 on specialised transport services (Mobibus), adopted on the same figures; a motion tabled by Yves Cruchten and signed by all groups, asking the government to have the Autorité de la concurrence analyse the specialised transport market, was adopted unanimously.
\nEmile Eicher (CSV), stating the new ceiling and the new end date proposed for school transport financing:
\n\n\nElo geet et drëms, dëse Montant op bal 281 Milliounen Euro ze erhéijen an d’Lafzäit bis de 15. Juli 2031 ze verlängeren.
\n
Now it is about raising this amount to almost 281 million euros and extending the term to 15 July 2031.
\nSitting of 29 April 2026, Emile Eicher, CSV
\nMeris Sehovic (déi gréng), explaining why school transport in the south costs 3.7 times more:
\n\n\nEt huet domadder ze dinn, dass mer am Süden, anescht wéi am Rescht vum Land, an engem extreem urbaniséierten, dichte Reseau fueren, mat ganz, ganz, ganz villen Arrêten.
\n
It has to do with the fact that in the south, unlike in the rest of the country, we run in an extremely urbanised, dense network, with very, very, very many stops.
\nSitting of 29 April 2026, Meris Sehovic, déi gréng
\nMarc Goergen (Piraten), criticising private bus operators for profiting from the school transport contracts:
\n\n\nHei ass elo eng Privatbranche, déi matkritt huet, dass hei Milliounen ze verdénge sinn.
\n
Here we now have a private branch that has realised that there are millions to be earned here.
\nSitting of 29 April 2026, Marc Goergen, Piraten
\n29 April 2026 — Premier vote constitutionnel.
\n| Party | For | Against | Abstain |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSV | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| DP | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| LSAP | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| ADR | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| déi gréng | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Piraten | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| déi Lénk | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Total | 51 | 4 | 5 |
Party splits: CSV, DP, LSAP, déi gréng voted for; Piraten, déi Lénk voted against; ADR abstained.
\nNo deputy voted against the majority of their party in this vote.
"}