Bill 8668 (\"Infrastructures ferroviaires\"). The Chamber debated and voted it on 5 March 2026.
\nSittings: Sitting of 5 March 2026, Sitting of 5 March 2026
\nThe Chamber debated and voted two mobility bills: PL8467 on recording air traffic controllers' workplace communications, adopted by 37 votes to 18 with 5 abstentions, and PL8668, the 138 million euro rebuild of the western approach to Luxembourg station, adopted unanimously.
\nMarc Lies (CSV), stating that the recording law serves safety and not staff monitoring:
\n\n\nD’Zil vum Gesetz ass d’Sécherheet, net d’Iwwerwaachung. D’Donnéeën dierfen net benotzt ginn, fir d’Performance vun engem Kontroller ze bewäerten.
\n
The aim of the law is safety, not surveillance. The data must not be used to assess a controller's performance.
\nSitting of 5 March 2026, Marc Lies, CSV
\nYves Cruchten (LSAP), stating that the retention period should have stayed at 24 hours and that his group cannot approve the bill:
\n\n\nAn dofir si mir der Meenung, dass d’Gesetz hätt misse bei deene 24 Stonne bleiwen. Mir kënne leider dofir deem Projet hei net eis Zoustëmmung ginn.
\n
And so we hold that the law should have stayed at those 24 hours. For that reason we unfortunately cannot give this bill our approval.
\nSitting of 5 March 2026, Yves Cruchten, LSAP
\nMarc Goergen (Piraten), arguing that the control tower is a sterile working environment where private conversations have no place:
\n\n\nDen Tower ass genau wéi de Cockpit e ganz sterille Kontext, an deem ee schafft. Do hunn och Privatgespréicher näischt verluer.
\n
The tower, just like the cockpit, is a completely sterile working environment. Private conversations have no place there either.
\nSitting of 5 March 2026, Marc Goergen, Piraten
\n5 March 2026 — Premier vote constitutionnel.
\n| Party | For | Against | Abstain |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSV | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| DP | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| LSAP | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| ADR | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| déi gréng | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Piraten | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| déi Lénk | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 0 | 0 |
No deputy voted against the majority of their party in this vote.
"}